Flashcards on Ethical Analysis of Euthanasia

Ethical Analysis of Euthanasia: Voluntary, Non-Voluntary, Involuntary

1 / 41

What is the main ethical distinction between voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia discussed in the text?

Voluntary euthanasia involves a competent patient's genuine request to die and is argued to have a stronger ethical case than non-voluntary euthanasia

Tap to flip · Swipe to navigate

Euthanasia

41 cards

Card 1

Question: What is the main ethical distinction between voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia discussed in the text?

Answer: Voluntary euthanasia involves a competent patient's genuine request to die and is argued to have a stronger ethical case than non-voluntary euthanasia

Card 2

Question: What concern do opponents raise about requests for voluntary euthanasia even if the ethical principle seems valid?

Answer: They argue we can never be sure a request is the result of a free and rational decision due to possible pressure from relatives, falsification, or the

Card 3

Question: List the Dutch court guidelines that aim to prevent abuse of voluntary euthanasia.

Answer: Euthanasia is acceptable only if: it is carried out by a physician; the patient has explicitly requested it with no doubt about desire to die; the dec

Card 4

Question: How have the Dutch guidelines affected the likelihood of murder disguised as euthanasia, according to the text?

Answer: The guidelines make murder in the guise of euthanasia rather far-fetched, and there is no evidence of an increase in the murder rate in the Netherland

Card 5

Question: Why is the possibility that doctors may be mistaken not considered a decisive argument against legalising voluntary euthanasia?

Answer: Because the risk involves only a very small number of unnecessary deaths compared with the large amount of pain and distress avoided for many truly te

Card 6

Question: What principle is invoked to justify choosing euthanasia despite a small chance of recovery?

Answer: Deciding on the balance of probabilities — using probability as the guide of life and death — where one may rationally give up a slight chance of surv

Card 7

Question: What counterargument is made that improved care might make voluntary euthanasia unnecessary?

Answer: Some claim improved terminal care has eliminated pain and that, with personal attention and proper medication, patients accept death and do not reques

Card 8

Question: What limitation does the text place on the claim that improved care removes the need for euthanasia?

Answer: The text concedes Kubler-Ross may be right and pain may be eliminable in many cases, but does not assert this universally; the claim is presented as a

Card 9

Question: According to the text, when do lives have no intrinsic value with respect to euthanasia considerations?

Answer: When individuals have no experiences at all and can never have any again (biologically alive but not biographically).

Card 10

Question: What thought experiment does the author use to question the value of survival in a comatose state?

Answer: Choosing between (a) instant death and (b) instant coma followed by death without recovery in ten years; the author sees no advantage in survival in a