Summary of Language Teaching Curriculum Design
Language Teaching Curriculum Design: A Comprehensive Guide
Introduction
Language Curriculum Design examines how curricula are conceived, influenced, and implemented in language teaching contexts. This material explains internal and external influences on curriculum change, contrasts curriculum-as-product and curriculum-as-process approaches, and outlines practical implications for designing language programmes in universities and other contexts.
Definition: Curriculum is a framework to guide and monitor teaching, shaped by both documented plans and classroom enactment.
1. Internal and External Influences on Curriculum
Curriculum change is driven by two parallel streams of influence:
- Internal influences: originate from within the language-teaching profession and applied linguistics.
- External influences: come from governments, educational authorities, employers, learners, and social/economic pressures.
Internal influences (within applied linguistics)
These include research findings and theoretical shifts in how language and second-language acquisition are understood. Changes occur because:
- New research proposes new theories.
- Ideas about second language learning evolve.
- Older theories are revised or modified.
Scholars and applied linguists generate assumptions and principles that inform curriculum design and implementation.
Definition: Applied linguistics is the field that applies linguistic theory and research to practical problems such as language teaching, testing, and curriculum design.
Ellis’s principles for instructed language acquisition (Ellis, 2011)
- Development of formulaic expressions and rule-based competence
- Focus mainly on meaning, but also attend to form
- Promote implicit knowledge while not ignoring explicit knowledge
- Consider the learner’s built-in syllabus (natural sequence learners bring)
- Provide extensive second language input
- Require opportunities for output
- Make interaction central
- Consider individual differences among learners
- Use assessment that examines free and controlled production
Practical example: A course that combines meaning-focused tasks (e.g., debates) with brief form-focused instruction (e.g., targeted grammar notices) aligns with Ellis’s principles.
External influences
External stakeholders demand programmes that deliver practical, measurable outcomes. Typical pressures:
- Need for English proficiency as a workplace and academic requirement
- Economic links between English and trade, innovation, income, and development
- Internationalization of higher education (English as a medium of instruction at universities)
Curriculum demands triggered by external pressures:
- Efficient outcomes delivered in minimal time
- Access to academic, professional, and practical content
- Teaching large numbers of learners
- Use of self-access materials, technology, and Internet resources
- Context-specific learning and domain-specific language use
- Authentic materials and problem-solving / critical thinking skills
- Emphasis on performance-based outcomes and assessment linked to task performance
2. Curriculum as Product vs Curriculum as Process
A central distinction in curriculum design is whether curriculum is treated primarily as a product (a planned document) or as an emergent process (created through classroom practice).
Curriculum as Product
- Treated as a document or framework directing teaching, materials, and assessment.
- Useful for managing large-scale programmes, ensuring consistency, and meeting external accountability.
Two common product approaches:
- Forward Design
- Sequence: content → syllabus → method → outcomes → assessment
- Used when goals are general (e.g., general language proficiency), with young learners or s
Already have an account? Sign in
Language Curriculum Design
Klíčové pojmy: Curriculum is influenced by both internal (applied linguistics) and external (stakeholders) forces, Ellis’s principles emphasize meaning, form, input, output, interaction, and individual differences, External pressures demand efficient, performance-based outcomes and real-world relevance, Forward design sequences from content to assessment; backward design starts from desired outcomes, Backward design steps: identify results, determine evidence, plan instruction, Process/ecological curriculum treats curriculum as emergent and learner-centered, Assessment in process curricula focuses on formative, assessment-for-learning practices, Designers should align outcomes with tasks and assessments for validity, Blend meaning-focused activities with targeted form-focused work, Use technology and authentic materials to meet scalability and context-specific needs