Roman Jakobson: Language Structure and Functions

  • Linguistics
  • Roman Jakobson language…
  • Roman Jakobson poetic…
  • Jakobson linguistics and…
  • Jakobson metaphor metonymy
  • Jakobson language structure
  • aphasia Roman Jakobson

Podcast

Aphasia: When Words Fall Apart0:00 / 25:44
0:001:00 remaining

Roman Jakobson: Unpacking Language Structure and Functions for Students

Roman Jakobson was a pivotal figure in 20th-century linguistics and literary theory, profoundly influencing how we understand language. His work, particularly on language structure and functions, provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing verbal communication. For students exploring linguistics, literary studies, or semiotics, understanding Jakobson's theories is essential for grasping the intricate mechanisms that govern how we use language to convey meaning, emotion, and artistry.

What is Roman Jakobson's Theory of Language Structure and Functions?

Jakobson's groundbreaking approach positions poetics as an integral part of linguistics, arguing that the global science of verbal structure must encompass all aspects of language, including its artistic dimensions. He challenged the narrow views of linguistics that disregarded poetic or emotive elements, asserting that language must be investigated in all its functional variety. He also highlighted the importance of distinguishing between objective literary studies and subjective criticism.

His framework emphasizes two core aspects of language: its constitutive factors in any speech event, which lead to distinct functions, and its fundamental bipolar structure based on selection and combination, reflecting similarity and contiguity.

The Six Functions of Language: A Comprehensive Overview

Jakobson identified six constitutive factors in any act of verbal communication, with each factor corresponding to a distinct function of language. While a verbal message may primarily focus on one function, others often participate accessorily. The predominant function determines the overall verbal structure of a message.

  1. Referential (or Denotative/Cognitive) Function: Focused on the CONTEXT.
  • This function is oriented towards the referent, providing information about the world. It is the leading task of many messages.
  • Example: A factual news report aims primarily at conveying objective information about an event.
  1. Emotive (or Expressive) Function: Focused on the ADDRESSER.
  • Aims for a direct expression of the speaker’s attitude toward what they are speaking about.
  • It tends to produce an impression of emotion, whether true or feigned. Purely emotive language is seen in interjections like "Tut! Tut!"
  • Example: An exclamation of "Wow!" after seeing something impressive, or a subtle change in tone indicating anger.
  1. Conative Function: Focused on the ADDRESSEE.
  • Finds its purest grammatical expression in the vocative and imperative moods.
  • Imperative sentences, such as "Drink!", are not subject to a truth test, unlike declarative sentences.
  • Example: Commands ("Stop!"), requests ("Please close the door"), or addresses ("John, listen!").
  1. Phatic Function: Focused on the CONTACT.
  • Serves to establish, prolong, or discontinue communication, or to check if the channel works.
  • Often involves ritualized formulas or dialogues whose main purpose is maintaining communication.
  • Example: "Hello, do you hear me?" or the reciprocal "Well!" dialogue between Dorothy Parker's characters. It's the first verbal function infants acquire.
  1. Metalingual (or Glossing) Function: Focused on the CODE.
  • Occurs when the addresser and/or addressee need to check if they are using the same code.
  • It clarifies or defines elements within the language itself.
  • Example: "'The sophomore was plucked.' 'But what is plucked?' 'Plucked means the same as flunked.'" This is crucial for language learning and often impaired in aphasia.
  1. Poetic Function: Focused on the MESSAGE for its own sake.
  • Promotes the palpability of signs, deepening the fundamental dichotomy of signs and objects.
  • It is the dominant function in verbal art but acts as an accessory constituent in other verbal activities.
  • Example: The political slogan "I like Ike" reinforces its impressiveness through sound similarities and structure. The phrase "innocent bystander" achieves impact through its dactylic rhythm.

The Bipolar Structure of Language: Selection and Combination

Jakobson argued that speech inherently involves two fundamental operations: selection and combination. These operations are crucial for both encoding (constructing) and decoding (understanding) linguistic messages.

  • Selection: Involves choosing between alternative linguistic entities that are equivalent in some respects and different in others. This occurs in absentia from a virtual

Check what you already know

Test · 20 questions · first 3 free

Question 1 of 30%

Gleb Ivanovič Uspenskij's speech disorder involved his first name and patronymic, Gleb Ivanovič, splitting into two distinct names designating separate beings.

Practise it with flashcards

34 cards · first 3 free, no account

1 / 34

What primary question does poetics address regarding verbal messages?

What makes a verbal message a work of art?

Tap to flip · Swipe to navigate

Practise it, don't just read it

34 flashcards, a test with explanations and a podcast for this topic. The account is free and you pick up right where you left off.

  • No credit card
  • Web and mobile app
  • 330,000+ students
Start for free

Related topics